How to give feedback to someone who used to be your peer
In short
Name the role change first, in private. Give the feedback on the behavior and its impact, not on the person. Be specific, listen to their side and close with a concrete agreement. The prior closeness is an advantage if you use it with honesty, not an obstacle.
- Name the role change first in a 1:1: that unlocks the real discomfort.
- Describe the observable behavior, not the person's personality.
- Good feedback has three parts: what happened, what impact it had, what you expect.
- Listen to their side before closing; close with a concrete agreement.
Why does giving feedback to a former peer feel so uncomfortable?
Yesterday you sat together at break and today you have to tell them their calls are falling apart. I know that knot in the stomach: I came up from the floor, and the first hard conversations with people who had been my peers were some of the most uncomfortable I've lived. It feels that way because the relationship changed and nobody named it out loud.
The discomfort doesn't come from the feedback: it comes from the new role. Before the first hard conversation, sit down in a 1:1 and say it straight: that your role is different now, that this doesn't erase the respect you have for each other, and that part of your job now is to help them grow. Naming the change unlocks almost everything else.
How do I separate the behavior from the person?
Describe the observable, not the identity. "You're sloppy" attacks the person and puts them on the defensive right away. "These three calls went off script at the close" describes a behavior that can be corrected without anyone feeling judged. That is the difference between fighting and coaching.
I use three parts, always the same: what happened (specific), what impact it had (on the team or the metric) and what you expect going forward (concrete). It's the SBI structure from the Center for Creative Leadership, and without the three parts it's not feedback, it's just an opinion. It's the same skeleton we work on in the Metodo FI coaching cycle.
What do I do after giving the feedback?
Be quiet and ask: "How do you see it?". I tell you this because it cost me to learn it: sometimes there's context you didn't know, and talking too much makes you look bad. There's always more buy-in when the other person takes part in the solution instead of receiving a verdict.
Close with a specific agreement and a date to review it. Feedback without follow-through disappears, and consistent follow-through helps you build authority without forcing it. If you want a structure for those conversations, download the free 1:1 template in Resources.
Frequently asked questions
And if they take it personally anyway?
It can happen, especially the first time, it happened to me. Stay calm, go back to the specific behavior and the impact, and leave space. Consistency sustained over time weighs more than a single conversation.
Is it better to give hard feedback in public or in private?
Always in private. Corrective feedback in public humiliates and breaks the trust of the whole team, not just the person. Recognize wins in public; correct in private. This rule has no exception.
Keep reading
To keep going with this
If you are a supervisor at this stage, start with the Fast Track Mentorship for new leaders and download the free template to structure your 1:1s. If you lead an operation and you are losing people in the transition, look at the leadership programs for companies.
References
- The SBI model (Situation, Behavior, Impact) from the Center for Creative Leadership (Center for Creative Leadership)
Written by Fiana Mora · Operations Manager · Founder of Lidera con Fi · PROSCI (ADKAR) · Six Sigma Green Belt
Are you living this right now?